Could the October 2012 shutdown of a nuclear power plant unit by Xcel Energy have anything to do with the series of radiation spikes we were exposed to in Minnesota around the same time? The spikes were first reported on Before It's News. According to (where you can find current radiation levels for Minnesota and across the U.S.) background radiation normally "might average anywhere from 5 to 60 CPM, and while background radiation levels are random, it would be unusual for those levels to exceed 100 CPM." On October 25, 2012, Before It's News reported radiation levels in Minnesota spiked to 101 CPM which is above the "Alert Level" on the website. Compare the image on the Before It's News website to one captured months before, in which Minnesota's radiation levels were completely unremarkable.

For days after the October 25th radiation incident, radiation levels in Minnesota fluctuated significantly. Here are two screenshots from showing some of those fluctuations (the red highlights were added to the screenshots to point out Minnesota levels and the date/time of the images). Notice how Minnesota radiation levels were the highest documented levels on the Radiation Network's US map at those times.

What do you think? Could the spikes have been related to Xcel Energy's nuclear power plant shutdown? And if not, what else do you think could have caused the radiation spikes?

Whatever happened, it would be nice to be informed what it was and that something has been done to make sure it doesn't happen again.

Views: 1155

Reply to This

Air Quality Forecast

Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN - Air Quality Forecast

Location: Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN

Today, 02/25/2017: Good - 50 AQI - Particle Pollution (2.5 microns)

Agency: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

Last Update: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 01:45:11 CST



Why Use Images of Canaries?

Canaries are known to be sensitive to toxic fumes, so miners used to bring the birds into mines with them as an early danger warning system. That's why “a canary in a coal mine” became an expression used for describing a person who provides early warning of a coming danger. For the environmentally ill who are sensitive to toxic fumes, the expression seems especially apt. That is why some of us refer to ourselves as canaries.


Just because something worked well for someone else does not mean it would work well or be healthy for you. This site is not meant to treat, diagnose, or provide medical advice. Do not take steps that could affect your health without consulting with your health care providers. The content on this website is for informational purposes only. Environmental Illness Network Minnesota is not responsible for, and does not necessarily hold the opinions of, members, member-moderators, or third party content contributors. You should be aware that if you post any health related information on this website it will be considered public information. Please review the Terms of Service, Guidelines, and Privacy Policy.

© 2017   Created by Site Facilitator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service